Let's Read ... Practical Wargamer #7 (Spring 1989)

This issue is a special one for me. It's the first issue of a wargaming magazine apart from White Dwarf. I was a bit of a Games Workshop junkie at that time, and barely knew about any other miniature wargames outside of the Games Workshop ecosystem. I did play board wargames when in high school, but never made the switch to historical miniatures. I still remember the magazine store where I bought this issue (although that copy is not the current copy in my collection), and that magazine store is also long gone. Time flies. 

 

The cover shows "Charlemagne's sword from Battle Orders", which I assume is a replica based on the coronation sword of the French Kings. Nice toknow (I had to look it up myself), but nevertheless, I much prefer miniatures on my wargaming magazine covers ...

In Points to Ponder the editor discusses a new type of paint - Maestro Craft Colours - which seem to be a good alternative to enamels. "Packaged in 60ml squeezy plastic containers which are fitted with a flip-top dispensing closure device ... ". All good things have to start somewhere!

Table Top Casualties (Charles S. Grant) discusses how to deal with casualties on the wargaming table. The usual solutions are discussed (figure removal, dead and wounded figures, ...) as well as some mechanics (e.g. keeping track of the % of casualties and only removing them when certain thresholds are met). The article also contains a photograph Indians carrying a wounded British officer. I still remember I was amazed that such figures existed ... and no surprise, but I do have that exact figure in my collection today!

Orienteering in the Orient (Keith Benson) presents an idea for a (naval) campaign based on the what-if Napoleon could succeed in reaching India after the Egyptian campaign. There are rules for amphibuous operations, map movement rates, briefings for players, uniform details, as well as a quite extensive list of ships of forces available to both sides. There's a funny map accompanying the article, showing the "Global viewpoint of the campaign". I think it's funny because it provides ... no information at all! Unless you don;t know where Egypt and India are located. Luckily, the other maps do provide some useful info.

Lepanto 1571 (Graham Dixey) is the typical article that gives a lot of historical background on a specific event in military history, with some minimal wargaming information tacked on near the end. But the article has some nice ship models!

In Search of Inspiration (Michael Burgess) offers some ideas on how take inspiration from history and insert them in your fantasy wargaming. The article is illustrated by interesting pictures, in which I do recognize some old Citadel models and even the original Citadel polystyrene Fortress.

Shaka's Wars by Ian Knight gives us some scenarios for the Zulu Wars during the early 19th century when various Zulu kingdoms were brought under one rule. If I remember correctly, this was the first time I saw an article showing Zulu figures, and I was deeply impressed that such a period and figures even "existed" in wargaming.

In Buildings for Battles, Peter Helm provides us with some tips on constructing your own wargame fortifications. A castle, earthworks, a fort, it's all covered.

Stingray - The Game (John Treadaway) is the big article in this issue. It protrays a game based on the 1960s TV show Stingray. When I first saw this article in 1989, I was deeply impressed since I had never seen such a game before, and couldn't even imagine such setups were also part of wargaming. At that point in my miniature wargaming career, I had been only exposed to Warhammer, so it was quite difficult to understand the rules as presented in the article. However, later on, when I had some more games under my belt, and felt comfortable breaking out of the Games Workshop ecosustem, I tried to make my own underwater game. The first iteration (somewhere late 90s) can still be seen here and here, and featured some underwater vessels based on the Full Thrust rules. In 2009, I designed another underwater combat game, which was featured on a few cons in Belgium. But anyway, this Stingray article provided the initial inspiration.

Kappel 1531 (Peter Wilson) presents us with a battle during the Swiss civil wars in the 16th century. Nice images!

Surrender! by Paul Stevenson is the sort of articles I always like in wargaming magazines. It gives some historical background on the numbers of POWs, and how this could be incorporated in one's own games, with some useful rules tips. Upon rereading this issue many years ago, I did include some POW rules in my own ACW house rules, so very useful indeed!

Wargaming American Style is a diary written by Don Featherstone about a trip he made to GenCOn/Origins in 1988. There has been a lot ink spilled on the difference between multi-day North American gaming cons and single day events in Europe, and this article gives an (early) nice take on that difference, written by one of the doyens of our hobby. "They go in for roleplaying in a bog way in the States and large numbers of the 14000 or so attending wore appropriate costume, thus one encountered trolls, orcs, knights, wizards and all manner of fearsome characters, sauntering around the halls, chewing burgers, and generally enjoying themselves." And there was a call-out to another doyen of the hobby, Duke Seifried, as well!

Bright Barossa (Arthur Harman) is an umpired multi-player map-game set during the Peninsular War. Lots of player briefings, such games always look incredibly fun, but alas, so difficult to set up onselves. 

Wavre - The Useless Victory (Stephen Allen) gives us the history of one of the battles of the 100-days campaign, as well as how to wargame the battle, and also a lot of photographs of how Wavre looks today. As a Belgian, I was (again) impressed. So wargamers travel to other countries (i.e. my own), to take pictures of battlefields to help their wargaming? 

Designing A Campaign by Charles Vasey offers some good ideas on how to run an ECW campaign. A lot of Citadel Townscape houses on display! 

The Bow in War and Wargaming (Chris Peers) gives us some things to think about when including bowmen in games. He proposes to make a difference between "shooting to hit" and "shooting to harass", and cites historical examples.

Overall, a very good issue! I really enjoyed rereading this one.

All issues so far:

Practical Wargamer 1 (Autumn 1987)

Practical Wargamer 2 (Winter 1987)

Practical Wargamer 3 (Spring 1988)

Practical Wargamer 4 (Summer 1988)

Practical Wargamer 5 (Autumn 1988)

Practical Wargamer 6 (Winter 1988/1989) 

Practical Wargamer 7 (Spring 1989) 

 

Let's read ... Practical Wargamer #6 (Winter 1988/1989)

It has been a while since I posted in this series, but time to pick up our readings of Practical Wargamer again!

So here it is, the 6th issue of Practical Wargamer. At this point PW had a full run of a year, so the magazine should have found its own style by now.

The cover looks promising, lots of figures, War of The Roses this time. As I have stated before, I firmly believe a wargaming magazine should show figures on the cover, and this cover has some nice flags as well!

The first article is Points to Ponder, a column and editorial folded into one. Stuart Asquith starts with an encouragement to submit articles, and then talks about drummers and musicians on the tabletop, and how they should affect morale (and subsequent actions) of a unit. But I'm somewhat puzzled by Stuart's claim that "we tend to ignore the presence of musicians on the wargames table". This is 1988, and by this time, Warhammer as a ruleset is well established in its 3rd edition. I played this edition quite frequently (actually, I never progressed beyond 3rd, but that's another story), and musicians were very much a part of the fantasy units in Warhammer, providing all sorts of bonuses and special abilities. Anyway, I agree that musicians do add color to the table as separate figures, but I guess we have better mechanics these days to have its influence depend on the survival of that specific figure table-wise.

In You Scoundrel ... I'll Liberate You, we are presented with the story of the battle of Vinegar Hill, a battle that took place in New South Wales in 1804. The author suggests a mini-campaign centered around these events. The article is typical for magazines of the 80s: a lot of historical information, with the assumption the wargamer can figure it out for himself how to turn this into a game.

The battle of North Cape (Graham Dixey) brings us to the cold waters of the Arctic Ocean, and tells us how the German battleship Scharnhorst finally was sunk. Again a lot of history, but barely any info how to make a game out of this. But then, these were still the pre-internet days. Wargamers needed articles like this to get a feeling of the historical context. 

Veterans! (Matthew Bennet) is offering us some mechanics on how to include veteran troops on the wargames table. Not by giving them some better statistics as would be a standard way to do it, but rather give each player some bonus cards that can be used during the game at any unit, which then ""turns out to be a veteran unit!". Suggestions for such cards include a forced march, ignore a morale test, form square faster than usually permitted under the rules, that sort of thing. I do like such simple mechanics that combine gamesmanship (when and how should I use the card?) with some narrative effects on the table.

 

Mayhem on the Medwin (Peter Helm) brings us back to the English Civil War, that grand period that British wargamers care deeply about but leaves the rest of us rather cold. Just kidding :-) The article describes a rather big setup with players acting as Commander in Chiefs in separate rooms, with objectives and victory points only known to them, and not to the commanders of troops at the table. It's the kind of game you rarely see these days, and such games always stir my imagination.

 

Kevin Dallimore reveals some of his "tricks of the trade" in How I paint Figures. I always admire such articles and the close-ups of figures in various stages of being painted, but to be honest, I have never excelled at painting (although I don't dislike it), and always wonder whether people actually spend all that time on painting a single face? But from such articles, I did pick up the techniques of undercoating, drybrushing, highlights and washes, which still serve me well up to this day.

 

Suomi - The Wicked War Sagas (Robin Hunt) gives us an overview of the Winter War during WW2, and also gives some decent advice on how to model a snowy battlefield as well as some kit availability.

 

Chris Peers gives us The Army of Tarmurlaine, an article focusing on the history of Mongols, but without a scenario or some good hints on how to portray such an army on your table.

In the continuing series of skilled figure painters, Graham Green shows part of his collection, mostly fantasy figures. Especially the Fellowhip of the Ring figures look very nice.

 

Campaigns with Clive (Paul Stevenson) highlights the possibilities of campaigning in 18th century India, and offers a lot of historical information to set up your own games, including a full table of all actions, battles and sieges in India at the time of Clive. All very useful as I said, but by today's standards, I would expect some more ready-to-use information to get a game on the table. 

Charles Vasey gives us some ideas on medieval campaign rules in Going to the Country, and offers a smallish card-based system to determine in what areas players might find support during the War of the Roses. Most of the article is taken up by historical descriptions about the difficulties of medieval campaigning.

Fighting in Buildings (Charles Grant) is a wargaming-centric article, explaining how fighting in built up areas can be incorporated in your rules. However, the author says "... it is not possible to produce a set of suitable rules within the scope of this article". Darn! However, there's a list of factors that we should include in our games, such as: categories of houses, firing into and out from houses, enetring houses, using ladders, barricades, etc. Although the articles leaves much to the wargamer, it is an article that stirs the imagination and gives some good ideas to start  from. 

Away All Boats (Keith Benson) gives an excellent overview of the planning issues involving amphibious landings in WW2, with quite a lot of suggestions for scenarios both for defender (e.g. preparation of the beaches), as for the transit phase, as for the final attack. A nice trick is to provide different maps to both sides.

Arthur Harman gives a small Napoleonic action in Rearguard Action at Cacabellos, set in the Peninsular War. It's a ready-to-play scenario, invovling the British defence and retreat from a small town built along a bridge over a stream.

 

Disguised Scenarios (James Oliver) describes the idea of taking an action in one historical period, and using it as the basis for a scenario in another period. An example is given for a WW2 coastal attack on France, based on an action in Cuba in 1962.

Marignano 1515 (Peter Wilson) tells us about a two-day battle between the Swiss and the French. during the Italian Wars. Mostly history, with some hints on how to turn this into a wargame. 

My "ad of the issue" is a smallish ad for cardboard models produced by "Draper Models", I couldn't find anything online about this company, except a small reference on the Lost Minis Wiki, with interestingly enough, a mention that at one point the company had an address in Belgium? And I also found a blog entry that shows a model of Hougoumont in cardboard, of which the author says it is from Draper Models.

 

Overall, this issue left me a bit cold. Yes, there are a lot of articles, but there's relatively little direct usable wargaming information. It almost seems as if for this 6th issue, the "good stuff" has already been used in the previous issues, and now we have to settle for mostly historical stuff. But maybe I am too negative here - after all, historical articles had their place in wargaming magazines.

All issues so far:

• Practical Wargamer 1 (Autumn 1987)
• Practical Wargamer 2 (Winter 1987)
• Practical Wargamer 3 (Spring 1988)
• Practical Wargamer 4 (Summer 1988)
• Practical Wargamer 5 (Autumn 1988)
• Practical Wargamer 6 (Winter 1988/1989) 

 

Check Your Six! game 20260201

 Last Sunday we played an old favourite of ours, Check Your Six! WWII aerial warfare. We played the first scenario of the Guadalcanal campaign book, putting 4 Wildcats of VMF-223 on their first patrol up against 6 Zeroes fresh out of Rabaul. Eddy and Ruben played the Japanese, JP and myself the Americans. Pilot wise the Japanese were all Skilled (these were army pilots, not the veteran Kido Butai naval pilots), while the Americans had a mix of two green pilots (played by JP), a skilled and a veteran pilot (the last representing the CO of VMF-223).

The table a few rounds into the game. The Japanese are closing in on the Americans in two groups.

I deliberately started the game with the planes a bit further apart then stipulated in the written scenario to prolong the approach phase a bit. This gave the players some time to get familiar with the maneuvring rules - it has probably been more than a decade since Eddy and myself played these rules and for JP and Ruben it was their first time to do so. During the approach phase, the Japanese advanced in two groups with Ruben taking his planes in a wide right hand sweep of the table. The American pilots, separated in two groups with about a single move distance between them, angled to intercept the other Japanese group piloted by Eddy.

Eddy and Ruben plotting their moves

Approaching the enemy is all good and well, but the real deal is of course the dogfighting once contact is made. JP's green pilots made a first sweep through Eddy's flight, but despite furious attempts from both sides, the high speed head on approach resulted in a lot of noise but no hits. At that point, my two pilots turned into the melee and positioned themselves to tail the Japanese. Unfortunately, that was when disaster struck -- my skilled pilot executed a text book Immelman to sneak up onto the tail of a Zero but miscalculated his maneuver and collided with said Zero (we ended up in the same hex at the same height, and both pilots failed their aircrew check). The result was two severely damaged planes (the Zero caught fire and would be shot down the next turn, the Wildcat pilot would need to crawl home and eject over the airfield as the plane's elevators were reduced to a few flapping shreds of aluminium), but an even worse outcome was produced when debris from the collision hit the veteran pilot's plane causing airframe damage before he had even fired a single shot.

The second flight of Zeros banking left into the fight

At that point, Ruben's flight joined the fight - three fresh Zeroes joined the two Eddy had left (the burning Zero involved in the collision was shot down by the veteran American pilot) and quickly set things to right. With the two green American pilots out of the fight (one had received engine damage and was severely slowed down, the other turned away out of the fight) and Eddy's remaining Zeros turning to catch up, it was up to Ruben's force to finish the job. The American veteran turned in to the pack of Zeros, counting on the fact that a head-on or deflection shot by the Japanese planes would probably miss. Unfortunately, Ruben's lead Zero pilot took careful aim, proceeded to hit the American plane with a full blast of cannon and machine guns and brought it down crashing in flames - scratch one American squadron CO.

At this point we called the game as a Japanese victory; The Americans lost one plane (flown by the squadron CO no less) and had two heavily damaged, while the Japanese only lost one plane. Well done to the Japanese players!

This game showed that we still like the CY6! system a lot - by turn 3 all players were no longer thinking of the rules but looking at the table and figuring out what tactical moves to plot to gain an advantage - as it should be. As an aside, the firing could be a bit more elegant (I know Phil will have his say about the roll-to-hit with modifiers, roll-for-amount-of-damage, roll-for-robustness with column shifts, roll-for-actual-damage sequence🙂 ) but as you're usually not playing with many planes on the table, it all goes quite smoothly in reality.

Will definitely be repeated!

Wet Paint: various items

It's been a while since I've done a wet paint post, probably because it's been a while since I actually painted some stuff. The last few weeks have been productive though, so here's some of the latest output off the painting table.

 

Fungal Giant - 3D printed figure

This figure has been 3D printed on my resin printer and was painted using Army Painter's Speed Paint. This was the first figure I painted with these paints (though not with this technique) and you can tell I was still feeling my way around the color selection. 

 

This and the next figure will become part of a fantasy army that is intended to go up against my dwarves.

 

Infected bear - 3D printed figure

Much like the giant above, this figure is 3D printed and painted with Army Painter speed paints. I got a much better feeling for colors with this one, insofar that I felt confident enough to try the speed paints on a historical unit, featured next.

 

Celt infantry: Eppegentii - Foundry, Renegade and Old Glory figures

 

 As mentioned, these were painted with the speed paints (with just a very few minor additions of regular paint). When painting them, I was not really happy with the result. Yet, as always, they turn out very well when put together in a unit. They are the seventh warband of my Celtic army, recently used with To the Strongest! rules. The best thing about this 20-man unit that it took literally less than 4 hours to paint - speed paints indeed.

 

GNW Björneborgs regiment, one company - Warfare miniatures

These are the first miniatures from Warfare / League of Augsburg miniatures I painted. While the figures are anatomically correct I do find the more exaggerated almost comical style of many other miniatures easier to paint (my other GNW Swedes are from Musketeer Miniatures). That said, these are lovely figures and I intend to build a few extra regiments with them. This company sneaked into the painting line because I need a single extra stand for an upcoming game.

 

These figures and the ones below were painted in my classic fashion, layering Vallejo Model Colour over black undercoat. 

Dwarven infantry - Mantic Games miniatures

This is the next unit for my growing dwarven army. The army is now up to one unit of crossbowmen, one artillery unit, two infantry units (including this one) and the chappie below.

 

Dwarven King - Scibor Miniatures

This figure will be the leader of my dwarven army. He's been painted with a few more layers than usual (well, mostly 3 layers instead of 2), noblesse oblige and all that.

Ah yes - the duck. Those of you familiar with my armies will know that most of my generals feature some form of duck as a banner or companion, and this one is no exception.

 

Wargamers' Annual 2026

Today I received my free copy of the Wargamers' Annual 2026 in the mail.

 

A free copy? Yes, a free copy, because I contributed an article about my experiments with adding storygame mechanics to wargaming.

I still have to read it (not only my own article, of course), but as you can see, it fits nicely with the rest of the collection ... a complete run of Wargamers' Annuals!

CRISIS 2025 (2)

The local tv-station aired a clip about the CRISIS wargaming show. Yours truly is visible during the first few seconds, with Wim explaining how he will crush the Galatian chariots ...

 https://www.tvoost.be/nieuws/wargames-beurs-sint-niklaas-het-is-meer-dan-een-spel-het-is-een-hobby-205202 

 

I went to a wargaming con ... CRISIS 2025!

For the first time since 2019, I was once again at CRISIS, the biggest wargaming convention in Belgium. We all know what happened during the years starting in 2020 (yes, Covid!), and as a result, CRISIS in Antwerp grinded to a halt. It was only last year in 2024 that CRISIS was revived  in a smaller format (partly due to Brexit), and at a different location. I couldn't attend last year, but this year, I was once again able to go, helping out my friend Wim in running an Ancients battle - Galateans vs Macedonians using the To The Strongest rules.

Since CRISIS is now held in Sint-Niklaas, only 20 minute away from where I live with a direct train connection, it was also the first time I went to CRISIS taking the train. Easy enough, and I didn't have to worry about finding a parking spot.

The event was the usual mix of clubs setting up games, and traders hawking their wares. The British traders are still missed (Brexit, you know ... ) but a veteran Belgian wargamer told me this could be a good thing! In his opinion, the dominance of British traders over the years meant we as wargamers from the mainland have been fed British military history for too long. Why should we care about the English Civil War, or be obsessed over Pegasus Bridge or Arnhem? Why not focus more on other battles and conflicts, which have been underrepresented in wargaming? I must say I do not entirely follow this argument, but there's something of a truth hidden there. 

Anyway, I had a good time ... talking to a lot of fellow wargamers, seeing old friends again, feeling part of the wargaming community at large ... that's what it's all about! 

Anyway, here are the photos, in no particular order ...

(Edit: sorry, I didn't take notes which game is what, so you must deduce it yourself ;-) )

Our own game, Macedonians vs Galatians, using To The Strongest:

Some pictures from when the doors weren't open yet, so not too many people around: