Final unit for 2012: Roman auxiliary archers

Painted a few days ago, photographed today, the last unit completed in 2012:



They're reinforcements for my Roman army, which I hope will see lots of action in 2013. The figures are Warlord Games Western Auxiliary archers, I strung the bows with normal-ish sewing thread.

Death by a million vent lines - or: one way to spend 4 hours with toy soldiers

Next on my project list of units to paint (yes, I keep a list—it helps to keep the momentum going) is the horse battery of the Bavarian army 1st Division of 1809. I already have the 1st infantry brigade and the cavalry brigade painted (4 line units, 1 light, one unit of dragoons and two of chevauxlegers plus asserted brass and lace to command them), and the horse battery is up now. This is the battery of Hauptman Ferdinand Regnier, which featured prominently and gloriously in the engagement at Arnhofen.

I'm representing the battery by 3 6–pounder gun models and 1 7–pounder howitzer. Bavarian horse artillery is of the wurst variety, where the gunners ride on cushions on the back of the gun carriage (not the limber) during transport. As the Bavarians used Austrian guns, I did the same and use Perry Miniatures Austrian artillery for my guns. The gunners will be replaced by Foundry Bavarian gunners. Very nice models, these Perry guns, but their mould maker seems to suffer from a 'never enough vent lines' syndrome.

Virtually every single nub, rivet and whatnot on the carriages and every single bloody spoke on the wheels (I counted) had the little worms of pewter attached. Which is why this took me 4 hours to build:



OK, I admit it - building a limber and stringing the traces also took some time, but as I abhor cleaning up miniatures, the time spent cleaning up the guns and carriages left a much bigger impression :). The limber is built from French pieces by Front Rank, BTW. I'll be replacing their riders' heads with Bavarian artillerists' heads (Foundry again).

More to follow as and when the various bits of the battery get painted, but I had to get this off my chest :)

Antares 2401 Campaign: Mission IV succesful

Recently we finished the 4th game in our SciFi skirmish campaign, Antares 2401. The game involved four squads of StarMarines laying an ambush to a convoy of the Icycle Kingdom on the planet Polaris VI.

I will not write the usual game report, just show you some pictures. I will also outline the philosophy of the campaign - but let's first look at some photographs, shot by Bart Vetters.

General overview of the gaming table. The convoy is slowly
progressing along the road, but the ambush is not sprung yet.

The fighting has started. All squads appear from their hiding places,
laying fire on the poor Icycle Kingdom warriors.
Note the snowbeasts pulling large sleds with supplies.

Eddy, Bastiaan and Koen discussing the finer tactics of the StarMarines of SpecOps.

Ambush in full swing. Both sleds are demolished, and fierce small arms fire is exchanged
between the StarMarines of SpecOps and warriors of the Icycle Kingdom.

 The Antares 2401 campaign started as a combination of ideas. I had some 25/28mm science fiction figures lying around of various manufacturers (including some 80s Games Workshop Space Marines, the so-called 'beakies'), and I wanted to put them to good use. That was idea #1.

Idea #2 centered around my plans - several years old - of running a WW2 campaign featuring special operations. Every player would control a platoon of SAS/SBS/... soldiers, and games would involve several historical known and lesser known raids (Bruneval, St-Nazaire, ....). Between raids, surviving figures would gain additional abilities or special skills. This format would also allow players joining or dropping out of the campaign rather easily. Within the backstory of the campaign, it simply meant new platoons being added or withdrawn from the Orbat of the special forces.

Idea #3 was to experiment with open-source games design. Instead of laying down the game mechanics from the beginning, I wanted to start very simple, and add/change/modify rules as more games were being played, with a significant input from the players. The basic framework involved 2 mechanics:

• Every figure has a number of action points which can be spent to move/fire/melee/special actions ... I borrowed it from one of my all-time favourite boardgames, Space Hulk. I think it works very well in a skirmish-setting, in which every player controls only a handful of figures. We have used this idea before in games like AquaZone (featured on CRISIS 2009).
• A 2nd mechanic involves firing personal weapons. Since we play on a hexgridded terrain, we can easily count the distance in hexes. A shot is succesful if the roll of a die is larger or equal than the range. This is a very neat way of building in distance modifiers, and makes players think about crossing open terrain, moving through dense terrain with limited visibility etc.

So, the Antares 2401 campaign was born out of a combination of the above ideas. And I think the campaign works very well so far, which is a bit of a surprise, since wargaming campaigns are known for bogging down and grinding to a halt.

So what are some of the key issues that make this campaign succesful?

• Personalization. Every player controls a designated squad, and every figure in the squad has a name. Figures can gain additional abilities between games, and built up a history of heroic deeds or heroic deaths. Moreover, players can customize their squads by providing names, battlecries, insignia (repaint the figures ...) and so on.
• Mission Reports. After every mission, every player must write a mission report to Divisional Command. This serves various goals: it keeps players emotionally attached and it develops the backstory of the campaign and of each squad. But the most important aspect of the reports are the 'recommendations'. Each squad commander has to recommend/report to DivComm future courses of action. This can include suggestions for new missions or investigations (story elements), or new training procedures (new special abilities), new weapons (new equipment) etc. I use die rolls to decide the outcome of each recommendation, and write mission dispatches from DivComm to inform the players back.
• Player involvement. As mentioned before, players can provide input for the campaign. But after each game, we usually have a short debriefing about what rules worked and what rules didn't. We update the rules after every game, but the GM has final say. Input from the players develops the game in a direction everyone (hopefully) likes, but the GM guards the coherency and elegance of the ruleset.
• No pressure on participating. Games are played with the squads of players that can participate in a given game. If a player is not present, his squad simply does not take part in the mission, but then, his squad does also not get additional experience. This framework makes it easy for players to participate at their own pace, something that is often the deathknell of more traditional campaigns.
• Variations in Setting and Scenery. Since the campaign is about special operations all over the galaxy, each game can feature a different set of scenery. We have played games on a jungle planet (Sardonis IV), a desert planet (Kalahari V), and 2 snow planets (Polaris VII and Polaris VI) so far.

I like the framework of the Antares 2401 campaign, insofar I am already thinking about expanding it to other settings as well. Perhaps a fantasy theme could include a tribe of warriors, each player controlling their own family or kin, and raiding the neighbouring countries - a Viking campaign could be a historical Dark Ages equivalent. We'll see. For now, we'll stick to scifi :-)

==> See also a previous blogpost about this campaign, Action on Kalahari V. It features some of the mission reports written by the players.

Busch's Grenadiers and some wild Celts

As said, December is a very productive month painting wise here at the Command Post (I live above the Post Office, and when we play games we Command our toy soldiers—hence the moniker). Here's some of the recent output, already shown before but now all dolled up:



These are of course the odd couple Stomachabundix and Loonix, both shown before but now based. Unfortunately, and I only noticed this in this picture, it seems some of Loonix tattoos have run a bit. I probably did not wait long enough before putting the varnish on …
And here's the full unit of Busch's Grenadiers for the Great Northern War:



And unphotographed but finished tonight are 8 Warlord Roman archers - 57 Olley points for December!

Wet paint: beware, dangling bits!

Next off the painting desk are two Warlord Games Celtic druids: Stomachabundix and his somewhat more free spirited nephew Loonix.



The pictures were taken on the painting desk with my iPhone, hence the their 'softness'—the camera on the iPhone is a royal pita to get to focus on something you want and not on what it wants. In this case, the letters on the paint pots seemed much more interesting to focus on to the camera (which is quite logical, they're black on white so much more contrasty for the AF algorithm to lock onto). Better pics to follow when I have based them.

Swedes repulsed at Tcheploievka! Captured Tsar exchanged for safe passage home!

We have played a lot of games with my Great Northern War collection, and most of them were some sort of scenario. While this is of course very realistic and commendable, sometimes one gets the urge to just put all the toys on the table and have a go. Which is just what we did over the course of two wargame evenings.

The battle we played was a fictional one, designed to bring the entire collection (minus some odds'n'ends) to the table in a straight up line-em-up-and-go game. Being a somewhat compulsory scenario writer, I could not leave things just like that of course, so I came up with a bit of backstory to put things in perspective. The battle is set in latish 1708, after Lewenhaupt was defeated at Lesnaya and had finally joined the main army, without the supplies he had been escorting over from the Baltic coast. Charles, knowing that wintering without his supplies would be difficult, had turned the army south to the Ukraine, lured by the prospects of waving fields of grain and an alliance with the Ukrainian Cossacks of Mazeppa. In reality, this ended up in a horrifyingly severe winter camp and the siege and defeat at Poltava the year after. In my alternate version of history, Charles manages to catch the Russian army near the village of Tcheploievka (current day Chapliivka in the Ukraine Sums'ka Oblast - I googled it :) ) where he had just crossed the Desna river on his way south. Knowing that this could be the decisive battle of the campaign, the armies line up to fight on the Ukrainian plain.

The first players to arrive got the task of coming up with the Swedish, resp. Russian plan. They were provided with a list of forces available and had to divide them in commands (a number of commanders was available to both sides) and draw the deployment of the various commands on a sketch map of the battlefield. Eddy, stepping in to the role of Charles XII, set up with a schwerpunkt of Swedish infantry on the left flank, screened by the woods left and all of the Swedish cavalry on the right:


The Swedish plan. A & B are infantry commands, C & D are cavalry

Koen, taking up the baton of Tsar Peter I Romanov, deployed in a more conservative setup, with two lines of infantry (one behind a small stream) and cavalry on either flank:


The Russian plan. Infantry in the centre, cavalry on the flanks

With the plans set up, Phil joined the Russian side and I played on the Swedish side. I was given command of the infantry (both brigades) by King Eddy while he himself took up the rein of the cavalry commands. The Russian command arrangement was more cooperative, with both Koen and Phil calling the shots all over the army.

By virtue of a dice roll, first move went to the Swedes. Eyeing the Russian setup, I knew I had a chance of breaking through their infantry lines, as the second line was too far back to give immediate support and the right flank cavalry (left for me) was hemmed in between their infantry and the woods. I could keep said cavalry screened with only one or two infantry battalions while the rest surged forward to assault the Russian line. If I could bring in the assault well and if Eddy managed to keep my right flank clear, we were in with a chance.


The Swedish deployment


The Russian deployment


The Russian High Command feels optimistic about their chances


King Eddy moving up the cavalry

The first two turns of the game saw a general advance of the Swedish infantry (though slower and less organised than I wanted—some failed command rolls), as well as an interesting sideshow by Russian Cossacks. Two squadrons (well, mobs) of Russian Cossacks had decided that their position on the right flank was not suitable for them and had taken it upon themselves to launch into a gallop across the battlefield between the two walls of infantry:


Adventurous Russian Cossacks can be spied between the two lines, moments before they would be chased off the battlefield

This was of course a target too juicy to leave out there, and a good blast of the Swedish guns and one charge of the Life Guard Grenadiers later, the Cossacks were set off in flight through the Russian lines. In hindsight, this might have been a mistake on my part. While it was fun chasing off the Cossacks with the Guard, it was probably useless—it is highly unlikely the light cavalry would have been able to impress the Swedish cavalry, particularly because they had to cross within easy range of the Swedish artillery for a few turns. Worse yet, chasing after the Cossacks disrupted the Swedish infantry line even more. In fact, due to this and the overall command malaise in the Swedish infantry (General Roos, one of the infantry commanders, managed only one successful command roll during the entire game. The only other times his troops advanced, it was because he Blundered or because the King commanded them.), the Swedish infantry attack devolved into a number of individual battalions struggling forward instead of combining into the steamroller assault I had in mind.

After the pleasant interlude with the Cossacks, things got more serious. Over on the cavalry flank, a swirling melee was developing that would more or less take all game to resolve, with both sides fighting each other to exhaustion (as a good cavalry melee should be). On the infantry front, the piecemeal infantry advance meant that the initial charge against the Russian line was carried out by only a single unit. Luckily, or not, it was the most powerful unit in the Swedish battle order—the grenadiers of the Livgardet till Fot, the Guard Grenadiers. With a cry of Gå På they crashed into the Tverski regiment, pikes at the ready and swords drawn:


Swedish Livgardet till Fot crash into the Tverski, supported by scattered Swedish infantry


A snapshot of the cavalry melee on the Swedish right

The world held its breath as battle was joined between the Swedish and Russian infantry. This was a high stakes fight, as both sides had a commander in the melee. On the Swedish side, Adam Lewenhaupt hoped to erase the stain of his defeat at Lesnaya by being the first to break through the Russian line. On the opposite side, none other than Tsar Peter I Romanov himself had joined the Tverski regiment as he knew how important it was to hold the line. When the shouts had died down and the dust began to settle, the vaunted Guard Grenadiers were seen to be streaming back to their own lines—the Swedish Guard had broken, leaving Lewenhaupt lying wounded on the field! On the Russian side the damage was worse however, as two units in the line (Tverski and neighbouring Schlusselburgski which had supported them) had broken. Worse yet, Tsar Peter had been captured in the melee and brought to the Swedish line by a pocket of grenadiers that had not lost unit cohesion. The Tsar was captured!


The Swedish have broken through the first Russian line, but can they exploit the break before the second line comes up?

Despite the loss of the Guard, things were now looking up for the Swedes. We had a break in the Russian first line, and the second line, while it had come closer a bit, was still not yet within supporting distance of the first line. The race was now on to see whether we could exploit the break before the second line moved up.


Russian command still seems optimistic, despite the loss of the Tsar


The Swedish cavalry commander assuring the infantry command that their flank would be covered


The crucial phase, seen from the Russian perspective. Note the disjointed Swedish infantry units

With the time pressure keenly felt by all Swedish commanders, infantry assault after infantry assault was thrown against the Russian line. But it was not to be. Because of the haphazard approach of the Swedish infantry, none of the assaults had quite the punch to cause great damage to the Russian line. While another three Russian infantry units were broken (I/Archangelski, Smolenski and Von Repnin's Grenadiers), this exhausted the Swedish infantry. The second Russian line, in a perfectly coordinated manoeuvre, had by now moved up. With the realignment of the right flank cavalry (static in the game till then) and the remainder of the first infantry line, the exhausted Swedes now faced a full line of fresh Russian troops who could easily hold them off with their firepower.


The godly hand of the Tsar's deputy aligning the infantry lines.

King Charles, whilst being a bit of a battlefield nutcase in general, let his better sense guide him in this battle and promptly signalled the Russian command the intent to negotiate. After much wrangling, it was decided that Tsar Peter would be returned to the Russian lines in return for the safe passage of the Swedish army back across the Desna. The war would not be over this year.


King Charles and Tsar Peter negotiating the end of the battle

This was a good game and a good Russian victory. While a big component of the Swedish loss was due to the uncoordinated infantry attack (mea culpa—Eddy on the other hand did a great job of keeping the Russian cavalry at bay), another big contribution to the victory was the fact that Phil did not lose his cool when the first Russian line was being assaulted. His response of moving up the second line, pulling back the first line and deploying the cavalry was the perfect game winning countermove. Well played!

Elephant Man

One of the project ideas playing around in the back of my head for 2013 is mass fantasy battle. Rules would be a modified Hail Caesar or a home brew set by rules writer extraordinaire Phil. As to figures, I have of course already amassed a sizeable lead and plastic mountain for this, consisting of dwarfs, elves, orcs and some weirder stuff. This is one of the weirder bits:



This is (obviously) an elephant man figure from Dragonblood Miniatures (called Cavalcade Wargames when I ordered them). For some reason I think he is going to be an ally for the dwarfs. No idea why though.

As an aside, the Russian Grenadiers of the previous post have now been brought up to their full 18 painted miniatures, but I'm only photographing and posting them when the basing is finished. December has been a very good painting month, reaching 47 Olley points, with maybe more to come.

Wet paint: Busch's grenadiers

Let's revive my tradition of driving up the post count with pictures of freshly painted toy soldiers, before they are even based or anything:



These are Busch's Grenadiers, a Russian Great Northern War unit, posing in front of my wall of paint. The figures are Reiver Miniatures, the wall of paint is Foundry :).

Painting a flag

I'm currently painting a unit of converged Russian grenadiers for the Great Northern War (Busch's Grenadiers). As the usual options I take for flags (Maverick Models, Little Big Men Studios or print out from a book I own) were not available for this unit, I decided to paint one myself.

The material I used was the foil from around the top of a wine bottle. These days, this foil is usually in some sort of plastic but this was an old fashioned metal one (I think aluminium, so not so old fashioned actually), so could be used for a flag as it is paintable and shapeable. I started by folding the foil around the flag pole, then unfolding it again and sticking it to a piece of cardboard for the base layer of paint:



The next step was drawing on the design in gel pen—I had tried pencil, but it was a rather hard one so the drawing did not show up or actually even took off some of the base paint. The design is the classic Russian GNW design of a celestial hand handing down a sword within a circle and wreath. I added a grenade because these are grenadiers:



The design was then painted over in the classic three layer (or two, as the case may be) method. You have to make sure the ink from the gel pen has dried though—mine wasn't quite dry yet the next morning when I tested it - hence the smudges on the left hand (obverse?) side of the flag below:




After painting most of the colours, except the final highlights of the field of the flag, I stuck it onto the grenadier ensign with white glue and painted on the final highlights. It then looks like this:



Not bad, but I prefer the prefab versions—a lot less work :).

Stipsciz Hussars

One our fellow wargame clubs (read: another bunch of guys that plays in each other's attics and garages :) ) in Belgium are the Stipsciz Hussars. Ever since I started on the strange attractor that is Napoleonics in 28mm (the One True Scale) I knew that at some point in time, I would have to paint up the Austrian hussars that gave them their name. That point in time has now come:



The figures are from Alban Miniatures and the flag is from Maverick Models (I use the 'Effect on Material' style of flag). And yes, I know the flag is probably wrong and certainly ridiculously oversized, but I call war gamers' license on this one. My miniatures, my unit, I decide the size of the flags :).

As an aside, I'm reading General de Brigade rules at the moment with the idea of using them for the Napoleonics games. So far we use Black Powder, which is very good and works well, but I want to see what happens with a more specific Napoleonic ruleset. Unfortunately, while the unit pictured above is played as one unit in Black Powder, in GdB it's only one squadron, with typical units being two squadrons. So they might have some friends coming soon :)

As a further aside, the lead two stands have been painted almost a year ago. They have already seen action (including in this year's Crisis game) but have also been featured in one of the 'big name' wargame magazines. Kudos to the first commenter (apart from the S&V guys themselves - that would be cheating :) ) to find magazine and issue.

Some of Rome's finest

And next off the 'painting' desk are these Romans:

 

I put painting in the sentence above between quotes as all I did to these figures was dip and base them. I bought them off eBay (no idea anymore as to who I bought them from) and they were already base painted. So one bath in the dip and some basing later, here they are. I did quickly paint on the very basic shield designs. The letters on them are V and B, being the fifth (actually the fourth in the collection, but who's counting :) ) cohort of Bartholomeus Sinister Grassus' legions.

Tiny Tin Men moving to Blogger

After almost ten years at my own domain (the first post on it was way back in early 2004), with a Movable Type install I managed myself, I have decided to move Tiny Tin Men over to Blogger. The reasons for this are twofold:

• Ease of posting and maintenance. While Movable Type is a very powerful and capable blog platform, it takes quite some effort to maintain and keep up to date (e.g. I'm probably a few versions behind on the installation), which is something that is entirely taken care of by Blogger itself on the new platform. Additionally, posting to Blogger (without third part software - I recommend MarsEdit for those on a Mac platform) is a lot easier, especially when you want to include things like images, which given the subject of the blog is more or less a necessity. This should make it easier for the blog authors (two of us) to post new stuff. 
• Exposure. Like it or not, the big boy in the club of blogging is Blogger - all of the buzz and action around wargaming blogs is in the fairly tight knit Blogger wargame blog community, and Tiny Tin Men fell completely outside that when on my own domain. Even though TTM has been around for a very long time, it gets only a fraction of page views of some of the other wargaming blogs. This is not so much an issue of 'fame' for me as much as one of forcing me to update the blog a bit more regularly. I figure that with more exposure, it will encourage us to post more. 

So, as of this post (which goes out to both blogs), only the new Blogger Tiny Tin Men will get updated. The old (nirya.be) site will remain online as long as I have my domain (which I foresee to be pretty much as long as I'm alive :) ), but posting and commenting to it will be disabled as of now. So everyone point your browsers towards and update your bookmarks to:

http://snv-ttm.blogspot.com

As an aside, I was looking at tinytinmen and ttm as host parts of the URL, but both are taken by blogs that have three posts and are inactive for months, resP. years. Oh well :)

Cossacks!

I'm painting up some Cossacks for my Great Northern War armies. After the mounted ones earlier this year, here are two small units of their footslogging cousins:

Mad Oleg's bunch:



Dashing Dmitro's rabble:



The figures are again from The Assault Group, except for Mad Oleg who is from Foundry (where he is called Red Renko).

More Celts

Following in the footsteps of their cousins the Larii, here are the Arboretes:



Again Warlord Games figures, which I must say are growing on me. These have a few bits from the British Celt box set on them (notably the leader and the spiky haired guy next to him).

(And yes, the peeling shield transfer on said spiky haired person has been fixed since taking this photograph :) ).

Celtic warband

Here are the Larii, a warband of Warlord Games Celts:



While I initially did not like these figures, and am still a bit doubtful about their poses (if you don't pay attention to posing, you end up with a war band of figures in one of two poses: 'I need to go to the toilet NOW' and 'I'm in the process of tripping over this bunch of grass here') I must admit that all ranked up (so to speak) they do look better than expected.

The smithy

And next off the painting desk, again in the category of 'hanging around the edges of the battlefield', the smithy:



Figures are from Wargames Foundry.

Austrian Generals

As usual, Crisis seems to revive my painting mojo, so here's some Austrian Napoleonic generals (or rather, field marshals) including none other than Archduke Charles himself:



The figures are from good old Wargames Foundry.

Napoleonic vignettes & stuff

Past weekend saw the 2012 edition of Crisis in Antwerp, where we presented a game based on the battle of Aspern-Essling in 1809 between Napoleon's French and Archduke Karl's Austrians.

For this game I painted up a number of extra vignette and scenery figures. First off, Foundry's marvellous Bavarian looters with accompanying angry farmer (a Ral Partha Ravenloft 'angry mob' figure kindly donated by Phil). As an aside, the Bavarians were painted up as being from IR 11 Kinkel, inspired by the wonderful plate in Osprey MAA 106 featuring the soldier from that regiment dozing off on the job while holding a piglet (of unknown regimental lineage):



A vivandière (Warlord Games) and a fellow who has sampled too much of her wares (from the Foundry Blacksmith set):



And finally some French casualties (again Foundry):

Some Medievals (aka Bretonnians)

I am slowly working through my piles of unpainted lead. A few years ago I made myself a promise that I would not buy any new (unpainted) figures, before all of my current backlog has been painted. The work is progressing at a steady pace, and here are some recently finished figures.

Most of the figures are Citadel / Games Workshop, from their Bretonnia range, early nineties. I even discovered some plastic knights from the MB game Battlemasters, which serve just fine. A few figures are Wargames Foundry.

Medieval armies provide great opportunities for heraldic devices, so I designed a couple of heraldic motifs that were easy to paint, or for which I had transfers lying around. The flags are from www.warflag.com .

The King is a small conversion from a plastic GW Bretonnian knight. The horse is based only on itshind legs, the king’s head is repositioned, and his weapon arm is replaced to bear a mace rather than a lance. The standard bearer is an old GW figure. His horse is emblazoned with the heraldic device of our wargaming club ‘Schild & Vriend’.

The King leading a column of knights.

Knights ready to charge. Note that each knight has an individual heraldic design.

Another view of the knights. A couple of knights in the 2nd row are plastic figures from the Battlemasters game.

I painted the archery in various simple colors. The flags are printed on paper, and given their ‘wavy’ effect when glued together.

Knights on foot. Again, each knight has a unique shield. The more complex designs are painted with the help of transfers.

The ‘Leuvense Garde’. I like giving my units fake names, in this case they bear the arms of my hometow Leuven. Figures are not Games Workshop, but Grenadier. They are a bit out-of-period, being late-medieval, but who cares, really?

An old Citadel organ gun. The two looters in the back are Wargames Foundry.

The siegetrain. The trebuchet is a recent model from Citadel, the mantlet is from Wargames Foundry.